A Graphic Re-visioning of Nonprofit Overhead

Original version written by  By CURTIS KLOTZ | August 16, 2016

Most nonprofit leaders agree that we need a new way to communicate about the true costs of our programs and the vital importance of strong organizational infrastructure. But we have not yet developed a simple, consistent message when sharing our view with potential supporters and investors. We are stuck with old terms and old images.

The following series of images and descriptions is really a blog in pictures. How we visualize our understanding of nonprofit structure and programs shapes the overhead debate. It’s time to get graphic about our new ideas—to deploy fresh images to help educate the public, our funders, and ourselves.

It’s Time to Retire This Pie Chart

When nonprofits are viewed this way, no matter how hard we try to think differently, we imagine important infrastructure of our organization as taking a slice out of the pie—as diminishing the “real” work of our mission.

Strategic financial functions, good governance, and the development of key funding partnerships are vital to strong organizations. We need a new way to communicate this truth.

We Need a New Image

Rather than thinking of our investment in key infrastructure as diminishing our programs, it should be seen as valuable Core Mission Support.

Core Mission Support functions are necessary, vital, and integral.

• Strong, strategic finance and accounting
• Progressive human resources practices
• Capable, responsive board governance
• Talented and engaged development staff

Whole Organizations and True Program Costs

Each of our programs is built around, is supported by, and shares responsibility for Core Mission Support.

All of the resources we need to accomplish our programs are the True Program Costs, which include four types of expenses:

• Direct Expenses: Program-Specific
• Direct Expenses: Shared by Programs
• Core Mission Support: Finance, HR, and Board
• Core Mission Support: Fundraising & Partners

Underfunded Programs Create a Gap at the Core

Some programs are only partially funded by contributions or by earned revenue.

When a program is only partially funded, the expenses not covered include a proportionate share of the Core Mission Support. This creates a Gap in funding for the finance, human resources, governance, and fundraising infrastructure that support the entire organization.

Line-Item Funding Creates a Gap at the Core

Some funders limit their support to only the direct expenses of program.

When funders support only direct expenses, they deny funding for Core Mission Support. This leaves a Gap at the center of our organization. Not only is one program affected, but the health of the entire organization is at risk.

Invest in the Core to Grow the Mission

The growth and effectiveness of our mission work depend on having a solid core at the center of our organizations. Investing in our infrastructure is savvy, prudent, and absolutely necessary.

Go Visual With Our New Thinking

Once we have a new way of understanding and communicating about the Core Mission Support needed by our organizations, it is our job to share our thinking with others. Our funders, supporters and investors all want us to succeed. They are partners in accomplishing our mission work. But like us, they may need help reimagining the role strong infrastructure plays in amplifying program effectiveness. By providing a simple visual guide, we can help transform the way we talk about, picture, and ultimately fund the Core Mission Support that is at the center of all great nonprofits.

https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2016/08/16/graphic-re-visioning-nonprofit-overhead/

RIC-NET and other Local NGOs give hope to conflict-affected girls in Uganda

Rwenzori Information centre (RIC-NET),  Hope and Peace for Humanity (HPH), Children of the World Foundation (COW), Foundation for Inclusive Community Help (FICH), COBURAS International Youth Organisation (CIYOTA), and Life Concern (LICO) with support from Global Fund for Children are implementing the project "Empowerment Conflict Affected Girls’" in selected Districts in Uganda.

Evelyn from RIC-NET explaining the programme out puts to partners

The organisations have been giving small grants to the girls to empower conflict affected girls economically to start their own businesses. Those living in refugee camps have since transitioned from depending on handouts from relief agencies as they have been trained to make liquid soap which they sell out. Education and entrepreneurship programmes have been established to impart knowledge and critical thinking in conflict-affected girls. The NGOs offers startup capital to various girls who are out of school.

Some of the beneficiaries are using the money generated from businesses to educate their siblings.A primary school has been established at Kyangwali refugee camp in Hoima District. 

Besides the financial and material support, the affected girls have been mentored and counselled which has improved their performance in school. They have also been presented opportunities to travel to various countries to share their experiences and success stories with other girls affected by conflict.

Peninah Karungi  and Janet Mbambu from Kasese with Otoo Emmy from GFC

Peninah Karungi, 23, who in 2008 fled the Allied Democratic Forces insurgency in Kicwamba Parish, Bukuku Sub-county in Kabarole District with her father is optimistic that she will make it through.“I lost my mother and younger brother during the insurgency. Our father suffered raising the four of us having sought refuge in Kasese,” she says. She adds: “My father told me to first complete Senior Four before my other siblings could enrol. Having completed in 2011, I stayed home for two years and lost hope of ever seeing the blackboard again.”But with support from the organisations (RIC-NET), Ms Karungi did certificate in secretarial studies and unpon completion secured a job in a law firm. “I used to earn Shs250, 000 per month and I worked for two years. I used part of the salary to help my father to pay rent,” she says.

Ms Akech, a Primary Five science teacher, thought her future plans had been altered by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) insurgency when she was abducted in 2004 together with 25 other girls during an attack in Ngai Sub-county. However, she escaped from the bush a year later. “In 2014, I dropped out of school because of school fees but one organisation enrolled me onto their programme. I completed my education and I am a teacher,” she says. 

Some conflict affected girls  from all over Uganda sharing their experiences in Gulu

Ms. Rita Tabu, 23, escaped with her brother from violence in South Sudan in 2002. Tabu’s parents did not survive the war and sadly amidst the chaos, their first brother disappeared. To this day, Tabu does not know whether her brother is still alive or not. “After the death of our parents, our aunt was told to take care of the three of us [two boys and one girl]. Our first born brother was a brilliant student but keeping him in school was a challenge,” she says. “He opened up a small business dealing in petrol by the road side when he was in Primary Two to make ends meet.” Upon joining Primary Five, the young Sudanese boy eventually dropped out of school. “He became mentally unstable. Few months later, he disappeared until today,” Tabu says. 

Tabu, then aged 11 sought refuge in a settlement camp in Uganda.“I started selling ground nuts and roasted maize. I carried water, smeared people’s houses and used the money to pay my school fees,” she says.Unfortunately, Tabu’s hard earned money was always taken away by her aunt. But for the past five years, Tabu’s story has changed, as she is among thousands of conflict-affected girls in Uganda currently being supported by Global Fund for Children under the Conflict Affected Girls’ Empowerment project.

Participants at the learning conference in Gulu on 19th June 2018

“I know it has been a tough journey but the good thing is that all of us have learnt through this process and the Global Fund for Children is extremely proud of you for all that you’ve achieved,” Mr Emmanuel Otoo, Global Fund’s regional programme director for Africa and Middle East, said while meeting addresing  partners at the annual learning conference in Gulu Town on 19th june 2018. 

Adapted from: http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/--NGOs-conflict-affected-girls-Oyam-District--Sudanese-boy/688334-4632870-y5u3bu/index.html